Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-10-26 Origin: Site
OEM drawing specifies AISI 1015 steel balls, but a Chinese supplier proposes GB 15 steel. Another drawing requests SAE 1045, while the available material certificate identifies JIS S45C.
Can these materials be accepted as equivalents?
The answer depends on the applicable material standards, their chemical composition limits, the finished ball requirements and the customer's substitution approval process.

| AISI | JIS | EN | GB |
| 1010 | S10C | C10E | 10 |
| 1015 | S15C | C15E | 15 |
| 1045 | S45C | C45E | 45 |
| 1085 | SWRH82A / 82B | C86D | 85 |
Chemical composition: Compare the applicable carbon, manganese, phosphorus and sulfur requirements rather than relying on a grade name alone.
Material standards: Confirm whether the proposed grade follows SAE, JIS, EN or GB specifications and identify the applicable edition.
Finished product requirements: Verify that the proposed material can meet the drawing's dimensional, delivery-condition and inspection requirements.
For example, SAE 1045 and JIS S45C are commonly cross-referenced, but substitution should still follow the customer's engineering approval process.
AISI 1010 and 1015 are commonly associated with JIS S10C and S15C, respectively.
However, 1010 and 1015 should not be treated as automatically interchangeable.
If a customer specifies AISI 1015, any proposed alternative must be reviewed against the applicable material and finished-product requirements.
For material availability and finished specifications, see RISHENG's AISI 1010/1015 Low Carbon Steel Balls.
High-carbon material designations such as GB 85 or JIS SWRH82A/SWRH82B may appear in supplier cross-reference discussions.
However, their chemical requirements are not necessarily identical to SAE 1085. Buyers should verify the original standard and proposed alternative before approval.
For available product specifications, refer to RISHENG's AISI 1085 High Carbon Steel Balls.

AISI/SAE, JIS, EN and GB standards use different material naming conventions and may apply different chemical or technical requirements.
For example, SAE 1045, JIS S45C and EN C45 are frequently associated with similar medium-carbon steel compositions.However, the existence of a common cross-reference does not automatically establish complete equivalence.
S10C is the closest JIS grade, with nearly the same carbon range (about 0.08–0.13 %). Compare Mn, P and S limits and get approval before treating them as interchangeable.
Often yes in practice, since S15C is the standard JIS counterpart. It still needs approval if your drawing names SAE/AISI 1015 specifically.
They are close medium-carbon grades. EN C45E allows 0.42–0.50 % C versus 0.43–0.50 % for 1045, so check the full chemistry.
GB grade 45 is the common counterpart. Confirm the GB standard and edition.
There is no exact one. Candidates include JIS SWRH82A/B and EN C86D. Each needs separate review.
No. It documents one batch; interchangeability needs comparison against the original specification.
Rockwell Corrected Value of Stainless Steel Ball Spherical Hardness You Should Know
Crushing Load of Low Carbon Steel Balls: Reference Values by Size
When Are Steel Balls Ready for Lapping? A Grinding-to-Lapping Transfer Guide
AISI 1010/1015 Carbon Steel Balls Precision: What Grades Are Achievable and When You Need Them
How to Choose a Steel Ball Grinding Machine: Ball Diameter, Capacity & Process Stage
PRODUCTS
CONTACT US